GRE Analytical Writing Examples Practice Questions with Answers
While the quantitative sections often focus on formulas, the GRE Prep journey is incomplete without refining your ability to communicate complex ideas. Unlike the GRE Data Interpretation Questions which require numerical precision, the Analytical Writing section demands rhetorical clarity and critical thinking. By examining high-scoring responses, you can learn to avoid common pitfalls such as circular reasoning or lack of focus.
Concept Explanation
GRE Analytical Writing is a standardized assessment of your ability to articulate and support complex ideas, construct and evaluate arguments, and sustain a focused and coherent discussion. In the current format, you are presented with a brief statement on an issue of general interest and a set of instructions on how to respond. You must take a position on the issue and support it with reasons and examples drawn from your reading, experience, observations, or academic studies. The scoring, which ranges from 0 to 6 in half-point increments, rewards clarity of thought, strong organization, and varied sentence structure rather than just a high word count. To improve your speed, you might use an AI Lecture Notes Enhancer to distill key philosophical or historical themes into usable essay evidence.
Solved Examples
Reviewing these GRE Analytical Writing examples will help you identify the structural components of a high-scoring essay.
Example 1: The "Educational Curriculum" Prompt
Prompt: "Educational institutions should dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed." Instruction: Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim.
- Introduction: Start by acknowledging the economic rationale (avoiding debt for low-prospect degrees) but state a thesis that disagrees, arguing that "success" is subjective and unpredictable.
- Body Paragraph 1: Argument regarding the difficulty of predicting success. Use the example of Steve Jobs or Vincent van Gogh, whose early pursuits did not signal traditional success.
- Body Paragraph 2: Argument on the intrinsic value of education. Explain that cross-disciplinary skills (e.g., philosophy helping a programmer) are often more valuable than narrow vocational training.
- Counter-argument: Acknowledge that institutions have a duty to provide realistic career data, but emphasize that "dissuading" infringes on intellectual freedom.
- Conclusion: Reiterate that personal passion often drives innovation more than institutional guidance.
Example 2: The "Technology and Thought" Prompt
Prompt: "As people rely more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate." Instruction: Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement.
- Introduction: Address the common fear of "cognitive offloading" but argue that technology actually shifts human cognition to higher-level problem-solving.
- Body Paragraph 1: Use the example of calculators. While we no longer perform long division manually, this allows us to engage in complex GRE Statistical Analysis and theoretical physics.
- Body Paragraph 2: Discuss how technology provides access to information, facilitating more informed critical thinking rather than less.
- Counter-argument: Admit that over-reliance on GPS or basic algorithms can lead to mental laziness in specific tasks.
- Conclusion: Conclude that technology is a tool that evolves human thought rather than destroying it.
Example 3: The "Government Funding" Prompt
Prompt: "Governments should focus their resources on solving immediate problems rather than on long-term goals that may not be realized for decades." Instruction: Discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning.
- Introduction: Define the tension between urgent needs (poverty) and visionary goals (space exploration/climate change mitigation).
- Body Paragraph 1: Argue that long-term investments often yield unforeseen immediate benefits. Cite NASA's research leading to modern medical imaging and water purification.
- Body Paragraph 2: Discuss the danger of "short-termism" in politics, where ignoring climate change today leads to catastrophic costs tomorrow.
- Counter-argument: Acknowledge that a starving population cannot wait 20 years for a solution, necessitating a balanced budget.
- Conclusion: Argue for a dual-track approach where immediate relief and long-term research are funded proportionally.
Practice Questions
- "To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities." Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree.
- "The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones." Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with this recommendation.
- "Governments should specify that at least half of the members of any board at a public university be from outside the academic community." Discuss your views on this policy.
Train smarter for the GRE.
Generate unlimited GRE-style questions and focus on the concepts that matter most.
Practice GRE Questions- "Colleges and universities should require all faculty to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach." Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree.
- "The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries." Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree.
- "Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could." Discuss your views on this claim.
- "Claim: Nations should suspend their efforts to save endangered species and focus on the needs of their human populations. Reason: Resources are finite, and human survival is the priority." Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree.
- "Young people should be encouraged to pursue long-term, realistic goals rather than seek immediate fame and recognition." Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree.
- "The best ideas arise from a company where employees are encouraged to dissent and challenge the status quo." Discuss your views on this statement.
- "In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements." Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree.
Answers & Explanations
For Analytical Writing, "answers" are not right or wrong but are evaluated on the strength of the argument. Below are strategies for the practice questions above.
- Major Cities: A strong response might argue that while cities are hubs of culture and economy, rural areas often preserve the traditional values and history that define a nation's identity. Use examples like New York vs. the American Midwest.
- Praise vs. Ignore: You could argue that while positive reinforcement is scientifically effective (citing American Psychological Association studies), ignoring negative behavior can lead to safety risks or lack of discipline.
- University Boards: Focus on the balance of perspectives. Outsiders bring financial and real-world accountability, but academics understand the nuances of research and pedagogy.
- Faculty Work Experience: Support this by mentioning the need for practical application in fields like Engineering or Business, but counter with the fact that theoretical fields (like Theoretical Mathematics) don't have direct "industry" counterparts.
- Contemporary vs. Posterity: Argue that contemporaries are blinded by bias or jealousy (e.g., Galileo), whereas time provides the distance needed for objective evaluation.
- Scandals: Discuss how scandals (like Watergate or Enron) lead to legislative reform (Sarbanes-Oxley Act) that dry speeches rarely achieve.
- Endangered Species: This requires a nuanced take on biodiversity. You might argue that human survival is inextricably linked to ecosystem health, making the "human vs. nature" choice a false dichotomy.
- Realistic Goals: Argue that while realism prevents burnout, "unrealistic" goals are often what lead to major breakthroughs in tech and art.
- Dissent in Companies: Use the concept of "Groupthink" (a term coined by Irving Janis) to show how lack of dissent leads to corporate failure, using the Challenger disaster as a historical example.
- Past Influence: Discuss the concept of "standing on the shoulders of giants" (Isaac Newton). Even revolutionary thinkers like Einstein built upon Maxwell’s equations.
1. What is the primary focus of the GRE Analyze an Issue task?
Frequently Asked Questions
How is the GRE Analytical Writing section scored?
The essay is scored by at least one trained human rater and an e-rater (an automated program developed by ETS) on a scale of 0 to 6. If the human and machine scores closely disagree, a second human rater is used to finalize the score.
Can I use personal examples in my GRE essay?
Yes, personal examples are acceptable as long as they are relevant and clearly support your argument. However, balancing personal anecdotes with historical, social, or academic examples often creates a more persuasive and sophisticated response.
Does spelling and grammar count toward the score?
While minor errors do not significantly lower your score, consistent mistakes that interfere with clarity will. The focus is on the quality of your argument and your ability to use varied sentence structures and vocabulary effectively.
Is there a specific word count I should aim for?
There is no official word count, but most high-scoring essays (5.0 or 6.0) tend to be between 400 and 600 words. It is more important to fully develop your ideas than to hit a specific number of words.
How can I practice for the Analytical Writing section?
The best way to practice is by writing timed essays using the official pool of issue topics provided on the ETS website. Using tools like the AI Exam Simulator can also help you get used to the interface and timing of the actual test.
Train smarter for the GRE.
Generate unlimited GRE-style questions and focus on the concepts that matter most.
Practice GRE QuestionsTags
Enjoyed this article?
Share it with others who might find it helpful.